Next Gen Consoles
#1
Posted 14 November 2005 - 04:33 AM
#2
Posted 18 November 2005 - 08:42 AM
ly comercialized game tech anyway...
#3
Posted 18 November 2005 - 10:55 AM
Anyways, I finally just went and took a look at PDZ screens and all I can say is WHAT THE FUCK?! WHAT HAPPENED TO JOANNA DARK!? She's some crappy ass punk rocker (with a gun) now. *sighs* I hate Microsoft. I hope the company dies and takes wal-mart with them. Damn them. Damn Microsoft!!!! AHHHHHHH I CAN'T TAKE IT!!!!....The rest if the game looks good. What did I expect to see from something made by a company run nerdy-stupid-ass bill gates? It's not about the game... it's about "appealing to our target audience". Fuck Microshit.
#4
Posted 19 November 2005 - 01:12 AM
With the exception of Nintendo, of course.
As usual, they've done something entirely new and innovative. The controller system is just crazy and out there, but possibly just what the gaming industry needs to kick back into intelligent gear.
I mean, the controller design. That's just magical.
sum day ill eat ur cat ricko...
#5
Posted 19 November 2005 - 04:44 PM
#6
Posted 19 November 2005 - 05:36 PM
But the controller looks like a boomerang.
#7
Posted 20 November 2005 - 01:22 AM
#8
Posted 20 November 2005 - 12:41 PM
#9
Posted 20 November 2005 - 01:46 PM
#10
Posted 20 November 2005 - 02:20 PM
#11
Posted 23 November 2005 - 09:54 PM
And Nintendo has new stuff all the time. Check out such games as Custom Robo..... it's only second in the series... (it's the first that made it to North America)... ok, so bad example. Yeah, Mario Party is getting really stale... Pokemon was new and fresh, except that now it's just regurgitated trash... Uh... Come on, Nintendo! Help me in your defense!
Hah! Nintendogs! Sure, it's just a virtual pet game, but it is to pet game as Halo is to first person shooter.
Uh... well... Ok. I'm losing faith. Nintendo? Why have I been following so blindly? Is it because you are cheaply affordable? Because I'm really starting to question my decisions.
Nah. You know what? Mario Sunshine is an incredible game, and it is entirely different to every previous game in the series. As for the Zelda series, they are only getting better. Sure, hours of sailing on the wide open sea isn't entertaining 100% of the time, but it was still a unique and innovative experience. Minish Cap gave me everything I wanted in a handheld Zelda, and I'd buy it again if I ever lost my copy. And again and again.
So overall I still stick with Nintendo, and I know the kinds of games that would fit this new controller system will be legendary. They'd have to be. They must be.
*begins to weep*
sum day ill eat ur cat ricko...
#12
Posted 24 November 2005 - 10:35 AM
#13
Posted 24 November 2005 - 12:38 PM
So, it's a monopolistic piece of sh*t game that shouldn't be played unless its for multiplayer and even then isn't all that different from other games out there?Hah! Nintendogs! Sure, it's just a virtual pet game, but it is to pet game as Halo is to first person shooter.
And Nal, I'm pretty sure you have to pay to download the old nintendo games.
#14
Posted 24 November 2005 - 08:20 PM
#15
Posted 26 November 2005 - 10:00 AM
As for hotspotting, sure, the access to millions of other players is free, that promotes the product. But I'm sure that if you're actively downloading software direct from Nintendo, they'll be charging your accout. That said, there will be workarounds, for example a Limewire client or the like. Other people leave their discs in their systems, "accidentally" leave the system on and connected to the internet, and with the client installed, and bam, you have yourself any game you want.
As for Micro$oft buying Nintendo, Bill mentioned once that he might be interested. He got burned by the president of Nintendo. Basically, Nintendo said "No. Not ever." And Nintendo is old money. They made hand-painted cards since the 1600s.
Along the same lines but not, it is possible to install Linux on your gamecube. Aww yeah.
sum day ill eat ur cat ricko...
#16
Posted 26 November 2005 - 02:32 PM
Halo multiplayer is alright. It isn't really anything special (that I have seen.) I'm sure with like 16 people it would be good but I'd rather play counter strike (or in a different genre D2). Halo's single player is the worst shit I've ever seen though. And so fu*cking monopolistic! If you want to actually beat Halo 2 you have to buya fu*cking 360 and the game itself. What's the point for Halo 2 at all. It's worthless. But then again, it isn't like gameplay is considered these days. It's all about the shiny graphics and pretty pictures. I mean after all, who cares what the game is about when the system itself looks like it may launch into space in a few minutes?Hey now, you have to admit, Halo is damn good. Bungie made a bad choice there, choosing so very many wads of money in order for the game to be distributed by Microsoft, but... Halo is just good.
#17
Posted 27 November 2005 - 01:00 AM
wow... thats long.... sorry bout that but i had to vent my nerdiness somewhere/how... melissa isnt exactly in to lengthy talks on video games...
P.S. - i think i may be a nintendo fanboy... sorry about the bias...
#18
Posted 27 November 2005 - 08:23 PM
#19
Posted 28 November 2005 - 03:26 AM
Oh and yeah, you are a MAJOR nintendo fanboy. Don't worry I accept you.
And melissa, video games contain lots of carbs, protein and...uh circuitry! Geeze. They are good for you. I swear!!!
#20
Posted 29 November 2005 - 10:23 PM
Which sort of leads into the whole free software issue. I am an avid (although not entirely educated) user of Linux, and I won't touch W*ndows. As a matter of fact, I petition that Drackir and Co. take a look at SDL. I know you saw it, Big D, and I have Clong on my computer as a result. It's good, strong, elegant, but mainly cross-platform and friendly. Oh, and free.
For the rest of you, in short: Simple DirectMedia Layer is a cross-platform multimedia library designed to provide low level access to audio, keyboard, mouse, joystick, 3D hardware via OpenGL, and 2D video framebuffer.
Back to the gamning industry talk, if designers can be free to make real games without stupid mass media frenzy pressure, life would be more than just who has the best marketing ploys. Nintendo is probably trying to win some freedom with this crazy insane remote - also remember the reason behind the design. It's something that just anyone can pick up and play. Simple, yet ultimately effective. Neither Xbox nor Sony could ever top that.
sum day ill eat ur cat ricko...
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users